Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an accused in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 can invoke Section 91 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 at the initial stage to summon the complainant's bank and income-related documents.
Analysis: The power under Section 91 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is discretionary and depends on the Court's satisfaction that the document sought is necessary or desirable for the proceeding. At the stage when particulars of the offence are to be stated, the defence of the accused is not ordinarily to be examined, and the accused has no enforceable right to compel production of documents to establish his defence. The requested documents were sought to test the complainant's source of funds and the Court found that such a request would amount to an impermissible enquiry at the initial stage. Non-filing of income tax returns by itself was also treated as insufficient to dislodge the complainant's case.
Conclusion: The application under Section 91 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was not maintainable at the initial stage, and the refusal to summon the documents was upheld against the petitioner.
Ratio Decidendi: An accused cannot claim a right under Section 91 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to summon documents for the purpose of proving his defence at the initial stage of trial; the Court may exercise that power only when it is satisfied that the production is necessary or desirable for the proceeding.