1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Registered firms not eligible for partner rebate under Income-tax Act, 1961. Double relief issue addressed. Appeal rights clarified.</h1> The High Court of Calcutta held that a registered firm is not eligible to claim rebate under section 88 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for its partners. The ... Charitable Purpose, Individual Partner, Registered Firm The High Court of Calcutta ruled that a registered firm cannot claim rebate under section 88 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for its partners. The court held that the rebate allowed to the firm cannot be granted to the partners as well, as it would amount to double relief. The court also stated that while a firm can appeal under section 246 of the Act, the question of apportionment between partners cannot be raised in that appeal according to section 247. The court answered both questions in the negative and in favor of the revenue.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
