TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court grants tax refund and expedites processing, petitioner to receive relief in 8 weeks, option to seek recall if needed.</h1> <h3>RAGHAVAN NAIR Versus THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 2 (1), THRISSUR AND DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER (CONSTRUCTIONS), SALEM</h3> RAGHAVAN NAIR Versus THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 2 (1), THRISSUR AND DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER (CONSTRUCTIONS), SALEM - TMI Issues:1. Relief sought for grant of credit for tax deducted at source2. Relief sought for expeditious processing of applications3. Grant of other incidental reliefs including costsAnalysis:1. The petitioner sought relief for the grant of credit for tax deducted at source while making payments. The first respondent, represented by Adv. Sri. Jose Joseph, informed the court that a decision was taken to grant a refund of &8377; 1,85,950 and steps were being taken to transfer the amount to the petitioner's bank account. The respondent stated that the grievance had been substantially redressed, and therefore, the cause did not survive. Adv. Smt. Krishna K. requested the court to place the statement on record and dispose of the writ petition.2. The petitioner also sought relief for the expeditious processing of applications. The court, after considering the statement made by the first respondent regarding the refund, disposed of the writ petition by accepting the statement. The petitioner was given eight weeks to receive the relief, with the liberty to file an application for recalling the judgment if the relief was not granted within the specified time frame.3. Apart from the specific reliefs mentioned above, the petitioner also sought other incidental reliefs, including the costs of the proceedings. The court did not explicitly mention the granting of these incidental reliefs in the judgment but focused on the primary reliefs sought by the petitioner regarding the tax credit and application processing. The judgment primarily addressed the immediate relief sought by the petitioner in relation to the tax credit issue and the processing of applications, ensuring that the petitioner's grievance was addressed promptly and effectively.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
