Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the revisional assessment orders under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 were barred by limitation, and whether the date of inspection or tax payment could be treated as the commencement of revision proceedings instead of the date of the revisional notice.
Analysis: The assessments for the relevant years had already attained deemed completion. For revision on the ground of escaped turnover or wrong availment of input tax credit, Section 27(1)(a) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 required the assessing authority to proceed within six years from the date of assessment. The Court held that the statutory exercise of determining escaped turnover and assessing tax begins only with issuance of the notice proposing revision. Inspection by itself, or payment of tax before enforcement officials, does not amount to completion of the statutory determination required for revision. Since the revisional notice was issued after expiry of six years, the consequential orders could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The revision was barred by limitation and the impugned assessment orders were invalid.
Final Conclusion: The writ petitions succeeded on the ground of limitation and the revised assessments were quashed.
Ratio Decidendi: For revision under Section 27(1)(a) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, the relevant reckoning date is the date of issuance of the revisional notice, and not the date of inspection or voluntary payment during inspection.