Tribunal Partially Allows Appeal, Orders Deletion of Additions, Disallows Business Expenditure

The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by directing the deletion of additions related to unexplained cash credits and bogus loans. A lump sum addition was made for disallowed business expenditure, with the disallowance under Section 40A(3) also deleted. The order was pronounced on 06/09/2019.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Disallowance of donation/subscription and entertainment expenses.
2. Addition of loan amount from M/s Chakra Infrastructure Ltd. (CIL) as unexplained cash credits under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
3. Alleged bogus loan addition from M/s Disha Productions and Media Pvt. Ltd.
4. Disallowance under Section 40A(3) for cash payments.
5. Disallowance of business expenditure as bogus.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Disallowance of Donation/Subscription and Entertainment Expenses:
The appellant did not press for the first two substantive grounds challenging the correctness of the lower authorities' action disallowing donation/subscription and entertainment expenses of Rs. 1,445/- and Rs. 12,075/-, respectively. These grounds were dismissed as not pressed.

2. Addition of Loan Amount from M/s Chakra Infrastructure Ltd. (CIL) as Unexplained Cash Credits under Section 68:
The primary issue was the addition of Rs. 6,44,95,068/- as unexplained cash credits under Section 68 of the Act. The Assessing Officer (AO) issued a Section 133(6) notice to CIL, which was returned undelivered. Despite the appearance of CIL's director before the AO, essential documents like profit and loss account, balance sheet, and bank statement were not provided. The AO concluded that the transaction's genuineness was not proved, leading to the addition.

The CIT(A) upheld the AO's decision, highlighting issues like the non-filing of returns by CIL's director, the unregistered sale agreement, SEBI's barring of CIL's director from the capital market, and police investigations against CIL. The assessee argued that the amount was part of an advance payment for a sale agreement, but the AO and CIT(A) found the agreement unregistered and the transaction not genuine.

The Tribunal, however, found that the lower authorities erred in not accepting the genuineness of the unregistered sale agreement. It was noted that the assessee had provided sufficient evidence, including ledger accounts and confirmations, indicating the transaction's genuineness. The Tribunal also observed that the addition under Section 68 should only apply to transactions within the relevant accounting period. The Tribunal directed the deletion of the impugned addition.

3. Alleged Bogus Loan Addition from M/s Disha Productions and Media Pvt. Ltd.:
The assessee's fourth substantive ground was the addition of Rs. 71,57,971/- as bogus loans. The Tribunal found that the assessee had provided sufficient evidence, including an RNI license agreement, accounting confirmations, and ITR acknowledgments, indicating that the amount was received legitimately. The Tribunal directed the deletion of this addition.

4. Disallowance under Section 40A(3) for Cash Payments:
The Tribunal addressed the disallowance of Rs. 9,60,669/- under Section 40A(3) for cash payments made to Shri J.P. Singh. The AO's remand report clarified that none of the cash payments exceeded the threshold limit of Rs. 20,000/- during a single day. The Tribunal, therefore, deleted the disallowance.

5. Disallowance of Business Expenditure as Bogus:
The final issue was the disallowance of Rs. 50,50,700/- as bogus business expenditure. The Tribunal noted that the assessee had provided detailed evidence of bills, confirmations, and payments made through banking channels. However, the assessee could not prove one-to-one matching of the impugned material purchases and the respective payees' books. The Tribunal deemed it appropriate to make a lump sum addition of Rs. 7 lakhs out of the disallowed amount, emphasizing that this should not set a precedent for other cases or assessment years.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee's appeal, directing the deletion of the additions related to unexplained cash credits and bogus loans, while making a lump sum addition for the disallowed business expenditure. The disallowance under Section 40A(3) was also deleted. The order was pronounced in open court on 06/09/2019.

---