TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court Invalidates Order under Kerala VAT Act, Citing Violation of Natural Justice</h1> The court set aside the order under Section 25(1) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003, finding it illegal and in violation of natural justice. The ... Principles of Natural Justice - the complaint of petitioner is that without actually deciding on the request of the petitioner made in Ext.P2, the order in Ext.P3 is issued - Section 25(1) of the Kerala VAT Act, 2003 - HELD THAT:- The petitioner through Ext.P2 requested time. It is in fairness of procedure, even one got reasonable time, ought to have been granted to petitioner for filing reply and producing books of accounts. In the case on hand, the first respondent has not communicated the decision taken on Ext.P2 and the petitioner for all reasons is clueless of the proceedings after submission of Ext.P2. The Ext.P3 order is illegal and violative of principles of natural justice - assessment is completed on or before 15.10.2019. Issues:Challenge to order under Section 25(1) of Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 as illegal and violative of natural justice.Analysis:1. Issue: Challenge to the order under Section 25(1) of the ActThe petitioner challenged the order dated 28.03.2019 under Section 25(1) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003, as illegal and violating principles of natural justice. The first respondent issued a notice to the petitioner on 08.03.2019 for re-assessment of the return for the assessment year 2012-13, nearly 5 and a half years after the said year. The petitioner requested time through Ext.P2, but the order in Ext.P3 was issued without deciding on the request made in Ext.P2. The court observed that the petitioner should have been granted reasonable time for filing a reply and producing books of accounts. The court found Ext.P3 order to be illegal and in violation of natural justice, as the decision taken on Ext.P2 was not communicated to the petitioner, leaving them unaware of the proceedings. The writ petition was disposed of, directing the petitioner to appear before the first respondent with the necessary documents for assessment.2. Decision of the CourtThe court set aside Ext.P3 order and directed the petitioner to appear before the first respondent on 19.09.2019 with the reply and books of accounts supporting the case. The first respondent was instructed to complete the assessment either on 19.09.2019 or any other date communicated to the petitioner, ensuring completion by 15.10.2019. The court emphasized the importance of following fair procedures and granting reasonable time to parties in such matters to uphold principles of natural justice.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
