Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether entry tax at 12.5% could validly be levied on excavators by treating them as motor vehicles, and whether such levy was discriminatory and violative of Article 304(a) of the Constitution of India.
Analysis: The levy of entry tax under the Entry Tax Act was examined in light of its object, legislative history, and the scheme of corresponding local tax rates under the sales tax and VAT laws. The tax was intended to maintain a level playing field by aligning the burden on imported goods with the tax burden on similar locally manufactured goods. Excavators had always been covered under a separate entry and were taxed at 4% under the VAT regime, whereas motor vehicles attracted a higher local rate. Treating excavators as motor vehicles for imposing 12.5% entry tax would sever the required nexus between entry tax and the local tax rate, resulting in a heavier burden on imported goods than on similar local goods. That would create discrimination forbidden by Article 304(a). The contention that input tax credit could later neutralize the burden was rejected because an otherwise illegal levy cannot be justified by a post-payment refund mechanism.
Conclusion: The levy of entry tax at 12.5% on excavators as motor vehicles was held illegal, discriminatory, and unconstitutional. The State was held not entitled to levy entry tax on excavators beyond the VAT rate applicable to such goods.