Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the reassessments for the assessment years 1957-58 and 1958-59 were valid under section 147(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, on the ground that the assessee had failed to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for the original assessments.
Analysis: The original assessments had been completed under section 23(3) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, but the assessee had merely filed balance-sheets and statements which did not disclose the real nature of the hundi loan transactions. The reopening reports submitted by the Income-tax Officer to the Commissioner recorded a prima facie belief that the loans were not genuine and that income had escaped assessment to the extent of the amounts specified for each year. On those facts, the Court distinguished the Supreme Court decisions relied upon by the assessee, as those cases lacked a comparable factual foundation for the formation of belief. The Court held that the finding that there had been no full and true disclosure of material facts was a finding of fact and was not shown to be erroneous.
Conclusion: The reassessments were valid in law and the answer to the referred question was in the affirmative, against the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the Income-tax Officer's recorded material shows a prima facie belief that undisclosed income has escaped assessment because the assessee did not fully and truly disclose material facts, reassessment under section 147(a) is valid.