Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Revenue appeals and the connected cross-objections were liable to be dismissed in view of the CBDT circular enhancing the monetary limit for filing appeals and the consequent low tax effect.
Analysis: The appeals involved tax effect below the prescribed threshold. The CBDT circular dated 08.08.2019 enhanced the monetary limits and expressly applied to pending appeals, read with the earlier circular and its retained clauses permitting withdrawal or non-pressing of appeals below the specified limit. The order also followed the principle affirmed by the Supreme Court that appeals below the revised monetary limit should not be pursued. Since the cross-objections arose only from the Revenue appeals and merely supported the appellate orders, they did not survive independently.
Conclusion: The Revenue appeals were held to be not maintainable and were dismissed as withdrawn. The connected cross-objections were dismissed as infructuous.