Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether goods found at a disclosed place of business, but not recorded in the regular books of account, could be treated as goods "secreted in any place" for the purpose of seizure under Section 67(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, and whether the security demanded for release of the seized goods was excessive.
Analysis: The expression "secreted in any place" was construed in its statutory context to include goods kept hidden from the revenue authorities for purposes of self-assessment, and not merely goods kept at an undisclosed premises. Since the assessee had admittedly not recorded the goods in its regular books, a rebuttable presumption arose that the goods were secreted. The phrase "in any place" was held to cover both disclosed and undisclosed places of business. However, as the seizure had been made from a disclosed business premises and the proceedings had not been finalized, the Court found it to permit release of the goods against part cash security and the balance by indemnity bond.
Conclusion: The seizure was upheld, but the security condition for provisional release was modified in favour of the assessee by directing release of the goods on furnishing cash security to the extent of 50% of the contemplated tax and penalty and an indemnity bond for the balance.