Court orders relief for petitioner in GST registration case emphasizing Nodal Officer's duty to address complaints promptly

The Court granted relief to the petitioner in a case concerning amendments to a GST registration application and rectification of errors in the GST Tran-1 form. Emphasizing the Nodal Officer's duty to address complaints promptly under the CGST and SGST Acts, the Court directed timely consideration of the petitioner's grievances and instructed a lawful decision within a specified timeframe. The petitioner was granted the option to seek further recourse if dissatisfied, ensuring a fair opportunity for resolution. The judgment concluded with directions for the issuance of a certified copy in compliance with procedural requirements.

---

---

Issues:
1. Petition for amendment in registration application as per GST Rules, 2017.
2. Correction of bonafide error in GST Tran-1 form for transitional credit.
3. Failure of Nodal Officer to address complaints under CGST and SGST Acts.

Analysis:
1. The petitioner sought a writ for amending the registration application in compliance with GST Rules, 2017. Counsel highlighted the appointment of a Nodal Officer by the Union of India to address grievances, citing a similar directive by Karnataka High Court in a related case. The Court acknowledged the necessity for the Nodal Officer to consider complaints and issued a direction for the same.

2. The petitioner aimed to rectify a genuine mistake in the GST Tran-1 form, resulting in the loss of transitional credit amounting to Rs. 9,74,57,802. The petitioner correctly filed the form within the stipulated time but erroneously omitted details in Column 6, affecting the credit ledger. Despite multiple complaints to the Nodal Officer, no action was taken. The Court emphasized the Nodal Officer's duty to address complaints promptly under the CGST and SGST Acts and instructed a timely decision on the petitioner's representation.

3. The Court reiterated the obligation of the Nodal Officer under the CGST and SGST Acts to review and decide on complaints. Emphasizing the failure to act on the petitioner's representations, the Court directed the Nodal Officer to promptly address the complaint and make a lawful decision within two weeks of receiving the order. The petitioner retained the option to approach the Court if unsatisfied with the outcome, ensuring a fair opportunity for redressal. The judgment concluded by directing the issuance of a certified copy in adherence to procedural rules.

---