Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the firm had goodwill for the purpose of valuing the deceased partner's share and whether any value could be attributed to goodwill; (ii) Whether the development rebate reserve was a liability deductible while determining the deceased partner's share in the surplus of the firm's assets over liabilities.
Issue (i): Whether the firm had goodwill for the purpose of valuing the deceased partner's share and whether any value could be attributed to goodwill.
Analysis: The finding of goodwill had to rest on material showing that the business had acquired reputation in the market or possessed some distinct commercial advantage. The record did not show any trade mark, special market standing, or reliable material to support the view that the product was uncommon or that customers could not readily obtain it elsewhere. Profits by themselves were insufficient to establish goodwill, and the reference to surrounding circumstances was unsupported by identifiable facts.
Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the accountable person and against the existence of goodwill.
Issue (ii): Whether the development rebate reserve was a liability deductible while determining the deceased partner's share in the surplus of the firm's assets over liabilities.
Analysis: The reserve was created out of accumulated profits under the statutory scheme governing development rebate and was required to be retained for business purposes. That character did not make it a liability of the firm for the purpose of ascertaining the surplus on dissolution. In valuing a deceased partner's interest, the firm's assets and liabilities are taken as a whole, and the reserve remained part of the assets rather than a deductible liability. The position was consistent with the earlier view that such reserve is not an expenditure or outgoing.
Conclusion: The issue was decided against the accountable person and in favour of the revenue.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered partly in favour of the accountable person: the goodwill issue failed for the revenue, but the development rebate reserve was held not deductible as a liability in valuing the deceased partner's share.
Ratio Decidendi: In valuing a deceased partner's interest on dissolution, goodwill must be proved by material showing commercial reputation, and a development rebate reserve created out of profits is part of the firm's assets and not a deductible liability.