Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2019 (8) TMI 931 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal Upholds Penalty Deletion; Emphasizes Good Faith & Due Diligence The Tribunal upheld the deletion of penalties in various instances, including the deletion of a penalty under section 271(1)(c) for the assessment year ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tribunal Upholds Penalty Deletion; Emphasizes Good Faith & Due Diligence

                            The Tribunal upheld the deletion of penalties in various instances, including the deletion of a penalty under section 271(1)(c) for the assessment year 2005-06, transfer pricing addition, disallowance of expenses for share capital increase, disallowance of miscellaneous expenses, and addition towards expenses on premises. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of good faith, due diligence, and lack of concealment or inaccurate particulars in penalty imposition, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.




                            Issues:
                            1. Deletion of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2005-06.
                            2. Transfer pricing addition and penalty imposition.
                            3. Disallowance of expenses incurred for an increase in share capital after amalgamation.
                            4. Disallowance of certain Miscellaneous Expenses and penalty imposition.
                            5. Addition towards expenses on premises and penalty imposition.

                            Issue 1: Deletion of Penalty under Section 271(1)(c):
                            The appeal was against the deletion of a penalty of Rs. 1,66,08,506 imposed by the Assessing Officer under section 271(1)(c) for the assessment year 2005-06. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) had deleted the penalty, leading to the Revenue's appeal. The Tribunal upheld the deletion of the penalty based on detailed reasoning, stating that the assessee computed the Arm's Length Price (ALP) of the international transaction in good faith and due diligence. The Tribunal found no concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars by the assessee. Citing a precedent, the Tribunal held that the penalty deletion was justified.

                            Issue 2: Transfer Pricing Addition and Penalty Imposition:
                            The Assessing Officer imposed a penalty on a transfer pricing addition of Rs. 15.58 crore, confirmed at Rs. 2.24 crore in the first appeal. The Tribunal overturned the application of the Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) method by the Transfer Pricing Officer, directing a fresh determination of the Arm's Length Price. The Tribunal held that the penalty imposition was not warranted as the ALP determination was done in good faith. The Tribunal's decision was supported by a precedent from the Delhi Bench, leading to the penalty deletion.

                            Issue 3: Disallowance of Expenses for Share Capital Increase:
                            The Assessing Officer made a disallowance towards expenses for an increase in share capital after amalgamation under section 35DD of the Act. The penalty imposed on this addition was deleted in the first appeal. The Tribunal also deleted this addition in its order during the quantum proceedings, leading to the deletion of the penalty as the foundation for penalty imposition ceased to exist.

                            Issue 4: Disallowance of Miscellaneous Expenses and Penalty Imposition:
                            The Assessing Officer disallowed certain Miscellaneous Expenses claimed by the assessee, leading to a penalty imposition. The Tribunal found that the disallowances were primarily made on an ad hoc basis and due to non-availability of relevant evidence. The penalty was deleted as the disallowances were not due to concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars by the assessee.

                            Issue 5: Addition towards Expenses on Premises and Penalty Imposition:
                            The Assessing Officer made an addition towards expenses on premises, confirmed in the first appeal. The Tribunal confirmed the capitalization of expenses at 40% but directed to allow depreciation on such capitalized account. As the addition was made on an estimate basis, the penalty imposition was not warranted. Citing legal precedents, the Tribunal held that no penalty can be imposed when additions are made on an estimate basis, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

                            In conclusion, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the deletion of penalties in various instances based on detailed analysis and legal precedents. The judgment emphasized the importance of good faith, due diligence, and lack of concealment or inaccurate particulars in determining penalty imposition under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found