Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Tribunal confirms capital loss penalty, deletes standard assets penalty.</h1> <h3>The ACIT, Circle-1, Ajmer. Versus M/s Baroda Rajasthan Kshetriya Gramin Bank (Erstwhile Rajasthan Gramin Bank), Ajmer.</h3> The ACIT, Circle-1, Ajmer. Versus M/s Baroda Rajasthan Kshetriya Gramin Bank (Erstwhile Rajasthan Gramin Bank), Ajmer. - TMI Issues:Penalty under section 271(1)(c) for disallowance of provision for standard assets and capital loss.Analysis:The appeal by the Revenue challenged the penalty order passed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2012-13. The Revenue raised grounds regarding the cancellation of penalty for disallowance of provision for standard assets and capital loss. The CIT(A) deleted the penalty for the provision for standard assets disallowance as the Tribunal had already deleted the addition in the quantum appeal. However, the penalty for the capital loss disallowance was confirmed by the CIT(A). The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision regarding the provision for standard assets disallowance as the addition was deleted in the quantum appeal, rendering the penalty unjustified. The Tribunal referred to previous orders where similar issues were decided in favor of the assessee, leading to the cancellation of the penalty. The Tribunal found no error in the CIT(A)'s decision regarding the provision for standard assets disallowance and dismissed the Revenue's appeal.In conclusion, the Tribunal upheld the deletion of the penalty for the provision for standard assets disallowance as the addition was already deleted in the quantum appeal. The penalty for capital loss disallowance was confirmed as the assessee admitted to filing inaccurate particulars. The Tribunal referred to previous orders where similar issues were decided in favor of the assessee, leading to the cancellation of penalties. The Tribunal found no error in the CIT(A)'s decision and dismissed the Revenue's appeal.