Court Rules on Revised Assessment Orders Post-Amalgamation: Procedural Compliance and Time Limits

The court addressed the procedural irregularity of issuing revised assessment orders in the name of a dissolved Transferor company post-amalgamation. It directed the reassessment to involve the Transferee company, allowing for objections and compliance with the TNVAT Act. The Transferee company was given four weeks to submit objections, with the Revenue department instructed to complete revised assessments within 12 weeks.

---

---

Issues:
1. Validity of revised assessment orders made in the name of the Transferor company post-amalgamation.

Analysis:
The judgment pertains to six writ petitions arising from the amalgamation of a Transferor company with a Transferee company. The central issue in all petitions was the validity of revised assessment orders made in the name of the Transferor company despite its dissolution post-amalgamation. The Transferor company, 'Sudirman Paper Private Limited,' was amalgamated with 'Sripathi Paper and Boards Private Limited,' with the amalgamation taking retrospective effect from 01.04.2011. The Transferor company's dissolution was communicated to the Commercial Tax officer, yet revisional notices and revised assessment orders were issued in its name.

The petitioner argued that the impugned orders were improper as they were made in the name of the dissolved Transferor company, even though the amalgamation had been notified to the tax department. The Revenue counsel contended that the Transferor company continued filing returns and paying taxes until October 2012, implying the validity of the notices and orders. However, the Court noted that the order of amalgamation was made on 20.09.2012, and until then, the Transferor company could operate independently.

The Court concluded that the revised assessments needed to be redone, providing the Transferee company, Sripathi Paper and Boards Private Limited, with an opportunity to respond. The impugned orders were to be treated as show cause notices for revised assessments, with the Transferee entity required to submit objections within four weeks. The Revenue department was directed to complete the revised assessments within 12 weeks based on the objections received, ensuring compliance with the law and communicating the revised orders to the Transferee company.

In summary, the judgment addressed the procedural irregularity in issuing revised assessment orders in the name of a dissolved Transferor company post-amalgamation. It directed the reassessment to be conducted with the involvement of the Transferee company, ensuring a fair opportunity for objections and compliance with the legal framework under the TNVAT Act.

---