Agricultural income-tax recomputation follows final income-tax appellate orders where the statutory scheme lacks express revision machinery.

Under the Bengal Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1944, agricultural income from tea had to track the finally determined income-tax computation, because section 8(3) treated the final income-tax order and any appellate or revisional order as conclusive evidence of that order's contents. Although sections 37 and 39 gave only limited rectification and revision powers and no express machinery existed to act on a later appellate modification, the statutory scheme was treated as requiring the agricultural assessment to reflect the final income-tax result. The Commissioner was therefore considered to have inherent and ancillary power to direct recomputation, subject to production of certified orders and the absence of any further modification under the income-tax law.

---

---

Issues: Whether, under the Bengal Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1944, the Commissioner could direct recomputation of agricultural income-tax on the basis of a subsequent appellate order under the Income-tax Act when the Act contained no express machinery for such revision beyond the period prescribed for rectification or revision.

Analysis: Agricultural income from tea was computed under a statutory scheme in which the assessment under the income-tax law formed the basis for agricultural income-tax liability. Section 8(3) treated the final order under the Income-tax Act and any appellate or revisional order as conclusive evidence of the contents of that order. Although sections 37 and 39 of the Bengal Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1944, provided limited revisional and rectificatory powers, there was no express provision to give effect to a later appellate modification under the income-tax law. The Court treated this as a defect in the machinery of the Act and held that the statutory scheme and legislative intent required the agricultural assessment to reflect the finally determined income-tax computation. To prevent manifest injustice and to make the taxing scheme effective, the Commissioner was held to have inherent and ancillary power to direct the Agricultural Income-tax Officer to recompute the agricultural income on the basis of the appellate income-tax order, subject to production of the relevant certified orders and the absence of any further modification under the income-tax law.

Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to have the Commissioner consider and act on the later income-tax appellate order for recomputation of agricultural income-tax, and the pending revision applications were to be disposed of accordingly.

---