Notional partition and female coparcener rights determine half share ownership, estate inclusion, and estate duty liability.

A widow who was a coparcener's limited owner under the Hindu Women's Rights to Property Act, 1937, was treated as having the same interest her husband would have taken on a notional partition. Section 14 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 enlarged property possessed by a female Hindu into full ownership. Applying notional partition principles, the Court held that the deceased widow's share was one-half of the Hindu undivided family property, that the share formed part of her estate on death, and that it was liable to estate duty. The mother of the deceased coparcener was held to have only a maintenance right and no partition share.

---

---

Issues: Whether the deceased widow, as a member of the Hindu undivided family, was the absolute owner of one-half of the family property and whether that share passed on her death.

Analysis: Under section 3(2) of the Hindu Women's Rights to Property Act, 1937, the widow of a coparcener acquires the same interest as her husband had in the joint family property, and under section 3(3) that interest is a limited estate with a right to claim partition. Section 14 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 enlarges property possessed by a female Hindu into full ownership. Applying the principles governing notional partition, the Court held that the widow would be entitled to the share her husband would have taken on a partition immediately before her death. On that basis, the deceased widow's share was one-half, and that share was includible in her estate for estate duty purposes. The Court further noted that the mother of the deceased coparcener had only a right of maintenance and no share on the relevant notional partition.

Conclusion: The widow was the absolute owner of one-half of the Hindu undivided family property, and that one-half share passed on her death and was liable to estate duty.

---