Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether tax liability could be sustained on the basis of excess stock found during survey, supported by the director's statement and survey note, notwithstanding the absence of actual weighment of the goods.
Analysis: The revision challenged the assessment on the ground that the stock difference was only estimated and not physically weighed. The material on record showed that the director of the assessee-company was present during the survey, disclosed the weight of the stock, signed the survey note, and never retracted that statement. The Court found the cited contrary decision distinguishable on its facts because, unlike the present case, there was direct contemporaneous disclosure by the person in charge of the business. In these circumstances, the authorities were justified in relying on the survey material and the director's statement to conclude that stock was in excess of the books.
Conclusion: The challenge to the addition based on excess stock was rejected, and the finding of tax liability was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a responsible person of the assessee, present at the time of survey, admits the quantity of stock and signs the survey record without retraction, the authorities may rely on that contemporaneous admission to determine excess stock even in the absence of actual weighment.