Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the revised assessment order under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 was liable to be set aside for want of personal hearing and whether the matter should be remitted for fresh consideration.
Analysis: The notice issued under Section 27(2) required a reasonable opportunity to show cause, and the record showed that the assessing authority had in fact chosen to afford a personal hearing. A factual dispute arose as to whether such hearing was actually granted. As the departmental file did not contain any clear record evidencing the hearing, the Court held that the proper course was to eliminate the controversy by granting a fresh personal hearing and directing reconsideration of the assessment. The impugned order was therefore set aside solely on the ground relating to personal hearing, without any expression on the merits of the assessment or penalty.
Conclusion: The impugned revised assessment order was set aside and the matter was remitted for fresh assessment after personal hearing, in favour of the assessee.