Appellate Tribunal rules on jurisdiction in disciplinary proceedings by IBBI.

The Appellate Tribunal held that the Adjudicating Authority lacked jurisdiction to quash disciplinary proceedings initiated by IBBI. The case involved a delay in the 'Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process' due to a typographical error, leading to disciplinary action against Mr. Vats. Despite the Adjudicating Authority's earlier recommendation and subsequent withdrawal, the Tribunal ruled that only IBBI has the power to close such proceedings. The Tribunal set aside the order quashing the proceedings, directing IBBI to make the final decision promptly. The appeal was disposed of without costs.

---

---

Issues:
1. Jurisdiction of the Adjudicating Authority to quash disciplinary proceedings initiated by IBBI.

Analysis:
The appeal was filed by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) against the order of the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal) quashing disciplinary proceedings initiated by IBBI. The central issue in this case was whether the Adjudicating Authority had the jurisdiction to quash disciplinary proceedings once initiated by IBBI. The Appellate Tribunal, after hearing the arguments, concluded that the power to close the disciplinary proceedings or pass appropriate orders lies with the Disciplinary Authority, which is the IBBI. The Adjudicating Authority does not possess the power to quash the proceedings, even if they were initiated based on the recommendation of the Adjudicating Authority itself.

The case involved the initiation of the 'Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process' against a Corporate Debtor, where Mr. Rishi Prakash Vats was appointed as the Resolution Professional. Due to a typographical error in Mr. Vats' name, the process was delayed, leading to an order by the Adjudicating Authority highlighting the lackadaisical attitude in the proceedings and recommending appropriate action by the IBBI. Subsequently, a disciplinary proceeding was initiated against Mr. Vats. However, upon providing a proper explanation for the delay, the Adjudicating Authority expunged its earlier observation and informed IBBI. Despite this, the Adjudicating Authority proceeded to quash the disciplinary proceedings, which was deemed beyond its jurisdiction by the Appellate Tribunal.

The Appellate Tribunal set aside the portion of the impugned order quashing the disciplinary proceedings and remitted the matter to IBBI for passing appropriate orders. The Tribunal emphasized that while expunging the earlier order could be a valid reason to close the proceedings, the power to make the final decision lies solely with IBBI. Therefore, the Adjudicating Authority cannot unilaterally quash disciplinary proceedings initiated by IBBI. The Tribunal directed IBBI to consider the reference made by the Adjudicating Authority and the subsequent acceptance of explanation, expecting a closure order to be issued promptly. The appeal was disposed of with no costs awarded.

---