Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether coercive steps of arrest under the GST regime should be restrained at the stage when assessment and adjudication were still pending.
Analysis: The writ applicant sought protection against action under the GST arrest provisions without compliance with the statutory scheme of assessment and adjudication. The order noted that arrest powers under the GST law are to be exercised with care and circumspection and that prosecution should ordinarily follow completion of adjudication. It also referred to the constitutional safeguards of personal liberty and the need for due process before coercive action is taken.
Conclusion: Interim protection was granted by directing that no coercive steps of arrest be taken against the writ applicant until the returnable date.