TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court Disposes Appeals on Income Tax Assessments for 2002-2005</h1> <h3>Shri. N. Baskaran, Prop. : M/s. Ram Leathers Versus The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle I, Vellore.</h3> Shri. N. Baskaran, Prop. : M/s. Ram Leathers Versus The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle I, Vellore. - TMI Issues:1. Jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer under Section 147 for reopening assessment.2. Tribunal's decision on the reopening of assessment.3. Appellant's success before the Tribunal and Revenue's lack of appeal.Jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer under Section 147:The High Court heard appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenging the common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal regarding the reopening of assessments for the years 2002-03 to 2004-05. The substantial question of law revolved around whether the Tribunal was correct in upholding the Assessing Officer's jurisdiction under Section 147 to reopen the assessments without a change of opinion. However, both parties agreed that the Tribunal had already ruled in favor of the assessee on the merits of the case, rendering the question of law unnecessary to answer.Tribunal's Decision on Reopening of Assessment:The Tribunal had granted relief to the assessee on the merits of the case. Although it ruled against the assessee regarding the reopening of assessments under Section 147, no independent appeal was filed by the Revenue challenging the Tribunal's decision. Consequently, the appeals before the High Court were filed by the assessee, as the Revenue did not contest the Tribunal's decision on the merits, thereby making the issue of reopening assessments academic.Appellant's Success Before the Tribunal and Revenue's Lack of Appeal:Given the assessee's success before the Tribunal and the absence of any appeal by the Revenue disputing the Tribunal's decision in favor of the assessee, the High Court disposed of the tax case appeals. It was concluded that there was no need to address the substantial question of law framed initially, as the assessee had prevailed before the Tribunal, and the Revenue had not challenged the Tribunal's ruling on the merits. Consequently, the appeals were disposed of without any costs, leaving the substantial question of law unanswered.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
