TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court overturns dismissal of appeal, stresses need for reasons in orders, directs reassessment.</h1> <h3>Sri Bairappa Krishnappa Versus Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Bengaluru</h3> Sri Bairappa Krishnappa Versus Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Bengaluru - TMI Issues:Challenging order dismissing appeal under Section 250 of the Income Tax Act regarding unexplained cash credit of hand loans.Analysis:The petitioner, engaged in agriculture and sericulture activities, declared availing loans from banks and private individuals in the return of income for the assessment year 2014-15. The case was selected for scrutiny, and a notice under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act was issued. The assessing authority and appellate authority rejected the claim of hand loans received by the assessee, adding the amount to the tax net.The High Court found that the authorities did not properly consider the documents provided by the assessee, specifically the letter of confirmation establishing the hand loans. The Court emphasized the importance of reasons in judicial orders, stating that orders lacking reasons are void ab initio. Both the assessing and appellate authorities were criticized for not addressing the documents submitted by the assessee, despite being a specific ground raised in the appeal memo.Highlighting the necessity of quasi-judicial authorities to provide a speaking order with reasons for their decisions, the High Court quashed the impugned orders and restored the proceedings to the Assessing Officer. The Assessing Officer was directed to re-do the assessment, considering the documents furnished by the assessee, and to pass a speaking order after hearing the concerned parties. The petitioner was instructed to appear before the Assessing Officer without notice, and the assessment was to be concluded in an expedited manner.In conclusion, the writ petition challenging the dismissal of the appeal under Section 250 of the Income Tax Act was disposed of by the High Court, emphasizing the importance of providing reasons in judicial orders and directing the Assessing Officer to re-do the assessment in accordance with law.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
