Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amount of Rs. 41,471 received by the executors under the deceased's agreement was assessable in their hands as income for the assessment year 1958-59, or was a capital receipt forming part of the estate.
Analysis: The amount represented commission payable under the deceased's pre-existing contractual right and was received by the executors only because the agreement provided for payment after termination and death. It was not earned by any profit-making activity of the executors and was attributable to services rendered by the deceased before his death. The amount had already been treated as part of the deceased's estate in the separate litigation between the heirs and the executors, and estate duty had been paid on that basis, which supported its character as an estate asset rather than current income of the executors.
Conclusion: The amount was a capital receipt in the hands of the executors and was not assessable as their income for the relevant assessment year.
Ratio Decidendi: A post-death receipt by executors under a deceased's contractual entitlement, which represents realisation of a capital asset belonging to the estate and not profit from any activity of the executors, is a capital receipt and not taxable income in their hands.