TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court Dismisses ITRs, Upholds Additions, Emphasizes Tax Adjustments</h1> <h3>M/s Kishan Chand And Co. Oil Inds. Ltd. Versus The Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Ludhiana</h3> M/s Kishan Chand And Co. Oil Inds. Ltd. Versus The Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Ludhiana - TMI Issues Involved:1. Dismissal of ITR No. 226 of 1995 as infructuous.2. Withdrawal of ITR No. 227 of 1995 due to taxable amount being less than Rs. 50 lakh.3. Disposal of ITR Nos. 224 and 225 of 1995 concerning addition of amounts on account of closing stock value and interest on FDRs.Issue 1: Dismissal of ITR No. 226 of 1995The counsel for the revenue conceded that no legal question arose in ITR No. 226 of 1995, leading to its dismissal as infructuous by the court.Issue 2: Withdrawal of ITR No. 227 of 1995In ITR No. 227 of 1995, the appellant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the reference due to the taxable amount being below Rs. 50 lakh, in accordance with circular No. 3/2018. The court allowed the withdrawal, resulting in the dismissal of the reference.Issue 3: Disposal of ITR Nos. 224 and 225 of 1995The court addressed ITR Nos. 224 and 225 of 1995, focusing on two questions of law. The first question involved the addition of amounts due to alleged suppression of closing stock value, which was upheld by the Tribunal. The second question pertained to the accrual of interest on FDRs, which the Tribunal also upheld. The appellant conceded that the first question was settled against them by a previous decision. The remaining issue was whether interest on FDRs should be considered part of the income in the year of approval or receipt. The court agreed with the Tribunal's decision that such amounts should be included in the year of approval, not receipt. The court upheld the Tribunal's findings, emphasizing the need for tax adjustments if tax had been paid during the proceedings. The case was disposed of accordingly, with pending matters also resolved.This detailed analysis of the judgment highlights the key issues addressed by the court and the decisions made regarding each issue, ensuring a comprehensive understanding of the legal proceedings.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
