TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Roasting ores into concentrate constitutes manufacturing under Central Excise Tariff Act</h1> <h3>Commissioner of Customs (Import), Nhava Sheva Versus M/s. Star Industries</h3> Commissioner of Customs (Import), Nhava Sheva Versus M/s. Star Industries - TMI Issues:Whether roasting of ores into concentrate constitutes manufacturing activity under Chapter Note 4 of Chapter 26 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.Analysis:The judgment revolves around the interpretation of whether the process of roasting ores into concentrate should be considered a manufacturing activity under Chapter Note 4 of Chapter 26 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The Hon'ble Supreme Court's decision in a previous case established that roasting ores into concentrate is indeed considered manufacturing under Chapter Note 4. The judgment highlighted that the process of roasting ores into concentrate results in a different product, as per the definition of 'manufacture' under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Tariff Act. This differentiation is crucial as it makes concentrates liable for excise duty, leading to the exclusion of concentrates from the exemption provided under Notification No. 4/2006-C.E., which specifically exempts only ores. The judgment emphasized the legislative intent to treat ores and concentrates as distinct items, with the strict construction of exemption notifications favoring the Revenue. The Tribunal's decision was upheld, concluding that concentrates must be treated as separate from ores post-roasting, making them ineligible for the exemption under Notification No. 4/2006-C.E.Conclusion:The judgment clarifies that the process of roasting ores into concentrate constitutes manufacturing under Chapter Note 4, resulting in concentrates being considered distinct from ores for excise duty purposes. Therefore, the appeal filed by the Revenue was allowed, emphasizing the strict interpretation of exemption notifications in favor of the Revenue.
TaxTMI 