Modvat credit on rejected goods returned for manufacture remains available despite procedural non-compliance where use in production is established.

Rejected or defective goods returned to the manufacturer and used in the manufacture of final products were treated as eligible inputs for Modvat credit. The Tribunal's view was affirmed because substantive entitlement depended on actual use in or in relation to manufacture, and the absence of the prescribed intimation or other procedural compliance under the Central Excise Rules, 1944 did not defeat credit where the statutory use condition was satisfied. The assessee's claim was therefore accepted and the Revenue's objection on procedure alone was rejected.

---

---

Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible on rejected goods returned to the manufacturer and used in or in relation to the manufacture of final products, despite non-observance of the procedural requirements under the Central Excise Rules, 1944.

Analysis: The Tribunal's view was affirmed because defective or rejected final products returned to the manufacturer and used as inputs in the manufacture of final products were treated as eligible inputs for Modvat credit. The procedural objection based on the manner of return and the absence of the prescribed intimation did not dislodge the substantive entitlement where the input goods were used in the manufacturing process.

Conclusion: The question was answered in the affirmative in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.

Final Conclusion: The Tribunal's order allowing the assessee's appeal was upheld and the reference was disposed of against the Revenue.

Ratio Decidendi: Rejected or defective goods returned to the manufacturer and used in the manufacture of final products qualify as eligible inputs for Modvat credit, and mere procedural non-compliance does not defeat substantive entitlement when the statutory conditions for use in manufacture are satisfied.

---