Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1976 (9) TMI 15 - HC - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Court Invalidates Advance Tax Estimate, Rules Penalties Inapplicable The court found in favor of the petitioner in the case. The court determined that the estimate of advance tax filed by the petitioner was invalid due to ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Court Invalidates Advance Tax Estimate, Rules Penalties Inapplicable

                            The court found in favor of the petitioner in the case. The court determined that the estimate of advance tax filed by the petitioner was invalid due to being filed out of time, rendering the imposition of interest under Section 215 of the Income-tax Act illegal. Penalty proceedings under Section 273(a) were also deemed inapplicable due to the invalid estimate. Despite arguments of delay and laches, the court held that the petitioner's pursuit of remedies in various forums did not disentitle him from relief. The court quashed the orders of the Income-tax Officer regarding interest computation but upheld the final assessment determined by the Tribunal.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Validity of the estimate of advance tax filed by the petitioner.
                            2. Legality of the imposition of interest under Section 215 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
                            3. Applicability of penalty proceedings under Section 273(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
                            4. Petitioner's delay and laches in seeking relief.

                            Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Validity of the Estimate of Advance Tax Filed by the Petitioner:
                            The petitioner filed an estimate of his income under Section 212 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, on 15th March 1963, indicating no advance tax was payable. The petitioner contended that the previous year ended on 28th October 1962, and under Sections 211 and 212, the last date for payment of advance tax or furnishing an estimate was 1st March 1963. Hence, the estimate filed on 15th March 1963 was in contravention of these sections and invalid.

                            2. Legality of the Imposition of Interest under Section 215 of the Income-tax Act, 1961:
                            The Income-tax Officer initially computed interest payable under Section 215 based on the assessment of the petitioner's income. The petitioner argued that the interest charged was based on an erroneous assumption that a valid estimate under Section 212 had been filed. The court noted that Section 215 is applicable only when an estimate under Section 211 has been filed, advance tax based on such estimate has been paid, and the advance tax paid is less than 75% of the tax determined on regular assessment. Since the estimate was filed out of time and no advance tax was paid under Section 212, the conditions for invoking Section 215 were not met, rendering the interest charge illegal and without jurisdiction.

                            3. Applicability of Penalty Proceedings under Section 273(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961:
                            Penalty proceedings were initiated under Section 273(a) based on the original assessment, and a penalty of Rs. 25,000 was imposed. However, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner allowed the petitioner's appeal, canceling the penalty on the ground that the estimate filed on 15th March 1963 was invalid and could not be the subject matter of penalty proceedings under Section 273(a).

                            4. Petitioner's Delay and Laches in Seeking Relief:
                            The respondents argued that the petitioner was guilty of delay and laches. However, the court found that the petitioner was pursuing his remedies in different forums, and the delay was not sufficient to disentitle him from relief. The original assessment was made on 16th December 1967, and the petitioner went on appeal. The Tribunal determined the income on 28th December 1971, and recomputation of interest was made on 4th February 1972. The petition for rectification was dismissed on 23rd April 1973, and the present application was moved on 1st June 1973.

                            Conclusion:
                            The court concluded that the petitioner succeeded in his application. The orders of the Income-tax Officer computing the interest under Section 215, including the order made on 4th February 1972, were quashed. However, the assessment as finally determined by the Tribunal stood. The rule was made absolute to the extent stated, and there was no order as to costs.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found