Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a civil suit for cancellation of a sale deed on the ground of fraud and misrepresentation, without seeking declaration of title, is barred by Section 331 of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950.
Analysis: Section 331 excludes civil court jurisdiction only where the relief claimed falls within the exclusive competence of the revenue court. A suit confined to cancellation of an allegedly fraudulent sale deed is materially different from a suit seeking declaration of title or tenancy rights. Where the plaintiff claims under prior sale deeds and its prima facie title is not under cloud, the plaintiff cannot be compelled to seek declaratory relief before the revenue court merely because the subject property is agricultural land. The relief of cancellation of a deed obtained by fraud or misrepresentation remains cognizable by the civil court.
Conclusion: The suit was maintainable in the civil court and was not barred by Section 331 of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950.
Ratio Decidendi: A suit for cancellation of a sale deed on grounds of fraud or misrepresentation is maintainable before the civil court where the plaintiff, as a recorded tenure holder with prima facie title, does not seek declaration of title and the revenue court lacks jurisdiction to grant cancellation relief.