Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit on imported capital goods could be denied as time-barred or under Rule 7(1)(b) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002, when the goods were received in 1994-95 and duty was finally settled later.
Analysis: The credit claim was examined in the context of the rules prevailing when the capital goods were received. The order recorded that there was no statutory provision prescribing a time limit for taking credit on capital goods, that procedural non-compliance could not by itself defeat credit, and that Rule 7(1)(b) was not attracted on the facts. It was also noted that the show cause notice did not contain the basis later relied upon to deny credit, and the findings against the assessee were unsupported by the record.
Conclusion: The credit could not be denied on the ground of time bar or on the basis of Rule 7(1)(b); the appeal was therefore dismissed and the assessee's entitlement to credit was sustained.
Final Conclusion: No substantial question of law arose, and the challenge to the grant of Cenvat credit failed.
Ratio Decidendi: In the absence of a specific statutory prohibition, credit on capital goods is governed by the rules applicable when the goods are received, and it cannot be denied merely on procedural grounds or by importing a time limit not found in the governing rules.