TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tax authorities' actions ruled illegal for lack of notice; emphasis on due process in tax matters</h1> <h3>M/s. LC Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd., (Formerly known as Laxmi Construction) Versus The Union of India Ministry of Finance, and Others</h3> M/s. LC Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd., (Formerly known as Laxmi Construction) Versus The Union of India Ministry of Finance, and Others - 2019 (28) G.S.T.L. 3 ... Issues:Challenge to constitutionality of Sections 50(1) of CGST Act and Karnataka GST Act, demand for payment, attachment of bank account without Show Cause Notice.Analysis:1. Constitutionality of Sections 50(1) of CGST Act and Karnataka GST Act:The petitioner challenged the constitutionality of Sections 50(1) of the Central Goods and Service Tax (CGST) Act, 2017 and the Karnataka Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The contention was that the burden of interest imposed on the Input Tax Credit available to the petitioner was unconstitutional. However, this relief was not pressed during the proceedings, and all contentions related to it were kept open.2. Demand for Payment and Attachment of Bank Account:The petitioner, a registered dealer under the GST Act, faced issues with claiming Input Tax Credit due to sub-contractors not uploading invoices and filing returns. The tax authorities claimed an excess availment of Input Tax Credit by the petitioner, leading to a demand for payment of tax and interest without issuing a Show Cause Notice. The authorities also sought to attach the petitioner's bank account without following the mandatory requirement of issuing a Show Cause Notice as per Section 73 of the Act.3. Violation of Principles of Natural Justice:The petitioner argued that the tax authorities did not comply with the mandatory requirement of issuing a Show Cause Notice before quantifying interest and attaching the bank account. The Revenue's counsel admitted that no such notice was issued as required by Section 73 of the Act. The Court observed that the issuance of a Show Cause Notice is essential before proceeding with the recovery of interest and penalties. The failure to issue such notice before determining interest and attaching the bank account was deemed a breach of natural justice principles.4. Quashing of Orders and Legal Remedy:After considering the submissions, the Court found the actions of the tax authorities to be illegal and perverse. The orders demanding payment and attaching the bank account were quashed. The Court granted liberty to the tax authorities to proceed in accordance with the law, emphasizing the importance of following due process and principles of natural justice in such matters. All rights and contentions of the parties were left open for further legal recourse.In conclusion, the judgment highlighted the significance of adhering to procedural requirements and principles of natural justice in tax matters. The Court's decision to quash the orders and allow the authorities to proceed lawfully underscores the importance of fair and transparent tax administration.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
