Section 7 insolvency admission survives quantum disputes and unsupported objections to filing authority.

In a Section 7 insolvency application, proof of default above the statutory threshold was sufficient for admission, and a dispute only over the quantum of debt did not defeat the proceeding. The record showed default, classification of the account as non-performing, and prior SARFAESI measures, while the appellant raised no effective challenge beyond the outstanding amount. An objection that the application was filed by a bank officer also failed because no material showed lack of authority. The appeal was dismissed and the admission order was maintained.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether a disputed quantum of debt prevents admission of an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016; (ii) whether the application could be rejected on the ground that it was filed by an officer of the bank.

Issue (i): Whether a disputed quantum of debt prevents admission of an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Analysis: The record showed that the corporate debtor had defaulted, the account had been treated as non-performing, and measures under the SARFAESI Act had already been taken. The only objection raised was as to the quantum of the outstanding amount. Under the settled scheme of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, once default is established and the debt is above the statutory threshold, the existence of a dispute as to amount does not prevent admission of the Section 7 application.

Conclusion: The issue was decided against the appellant and in favour of the financial creditor; the Section 7 application was rightly admitted.

Issue (ii): Whether the application could be rejected on the ground that it was filed by an officer of the bank.

Analysis: The application had been filed by one of the officers of the bank. No material was shown to establish lack of authority so as to invalidate the proceeding.

Conclusion: The issue was decided against the appellant and in favour of the financial creditor; the objection regarding authorization was not accepted.

Final Conclusion: The appeal failed and the order admitting the insolvency application was maintained.

Ratio Decidendi: In a Section 7 insolvency application, proof of default above the statutory threshold is sufficient for admission, and a mere dispute over the quantum of debt does not defeat the proceeding; an objection to filing authority must be supported by material showing absence of authorization.

---