GST Ruling: Job work services for manufacturing beer subject to 18% GST rate

The judgment affirms that the activities conducted by PIL for the Appellant constitute job work under GST, attracting an 18% GST rate. The fees paid to PIL for manufacturing beer are subject to GST as they are for job work services, not the supply of alcoholic liquor for human consumption. While the manufacturing processes are not exempt from GST, the sale of alcoholic liquor for human consumption falls outside the GST scope. The court rules that the job work services provided by PIL do not qualify for a 5% GST rate under food products classification, but instead attract an 18% GST rate.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Whether the activities performed by PIL for the Appellant constitute job work under GST.
2. Whether the fees paid to PIL for manufacturing beer are subject to GST.
3. Whether the supply of alcoholic liquor for human consumption is outside the purview of GST.
4. The appropriate GST rate applicable if the activities are considered job work.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Whether the activities performed by PIL for the Appellant constitute job work under GST:
The judgment examines the definition of "job work" under Section 2(68) of the CGST Act, which means any treatment or process undertaken by a person on goods belonging to another registered person. It was found that PIL undertakes brewing, bottling, and packaging of beer based on the Appellant's instructions, using raw materials and inputs procured as per the Appellant's specifications. The Appellant bears the cost of these materials, and the insurance is also in the Appellant's name. Despite PIL purchasing the raw materials, the Appellant controls the quality, sources, and terms of procurement, indicating that PIL is performing job work on goods belonging to the Appellant.

2. Whether the fees paid to PIL for manufacturing beer are subject to GST:
The judgment clarifies that PIL is paid a fixed fee for manufacturing beer, not for selling it to the Appellant. The manufactured beer is sold to buyers identified by the Appellant, and the sale proceeds are credited to an account controlled by the Appellant. Thus, the fixed fee paid to PIL is for job work services, not for the supply of alcoholic liquor for human consumption, making it subject to GST.

3. Whether the supply of alcoholic liquor for human consumption is outside the purview of GST:
The judgment references Article 366(12A) of the Constitution and Section 9(1) of the CGST Act, which exclude the supply of alcoholic liquor for human consumption from GST. However, it interprets that this exclusion applies only to the sale of alcoholic liquor, not to the processes involved in its manufacture. Therefore, the job work services provided by PIL, which are part of the manufacturing process, are not excluded from GST.

4. The appropriate GST rate applicable if the activities are considered job work:
The Appellant argued for a GST rate of 5% under Notification No. 11/2017, classifying the activities under food and food products. However, the judgment, referencing Supreme Court rulings, concludes that alcoholic liquor for human consumption does not qualify as food or food products for GST exemption purposes. Therefore, the job work services provided by PIL attract an 18% GST rate.

Conclusion:
The judgment upholds the Advance Ruling Authority's decision that the activities performed by PIL are in the nature of job work and attract 18% GST. The fees paid to PIL for these services are subject to GST, and the supply of alcoholic liquor for human consumption is outside the GST purview only in terms of its sale, not the manufacturing processes.

---