Investment in Plot for New House Allowed as Exemption under Section 54

The Tribunal held that the investment in the purchase of the plot forms an integral part of the cost of the new residential house and is allowable as an exemption under Section 54 of the Income Tax Act. The assessee's actions demonstrated the intention to construct a new residential house, and the Tribunal applied a purposive interpretation of the law, directing the Assessing Officer to allow the exemption. The appeal was allowed, and the order was pronounced in Open Court on 14th May 2019.

---

---

Issues Involved:

1. Denial of exemption under Section 54 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2. Determination of the date of sale for the purpose of Section 54.
3. Consideration of investment in a plot of land for the construction of a residential property under Section 54.
4. Compliance with the stipulated time frame for construction of a new residential house under Section 54.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Denial of exemption under Section 54 of the Income Tax Act, 1961:
The assessee had claimed an exemption under Section 54 for Rs. 1,58,00,000/- invested in the acquisition of a residential plot and Rs. 25,10,000/- deposited in a Capital Gain Account. The Assessing Officer (AO) allowed the exemption for the amount deposited in the Capital Gain Account but denied the exemption for the investment in the plot, citing that the assessee neither purchased a house nor constructed one within the stipulated time under Section 54.

2. Determination of the date of sale for the purpose of Section 54:
The AO and CIT(A) assumed that the transfer through a registered instrument of conveyance dated 28/11/2014 should be considered as the date of sale, not the agreement to sell dated 07/04/2014. The CIT(A) emphasized that the investment in the plot was made more than one year before the transfer of the capital asset, which did not satisfy the conditions required under Section 54.

3. Consideration of investment in a plot of land for the construction of a residential property under Section 54:
The CIT(A) observed that the investment in a plot of land did not amount to the purchase of a residential house within the meaning of Section 54. The assessee argued that the cost of the plot forms an integral part of the cost of the residential house and should be considered for exemption under Section 54. The assessee cited various case laws and a CBDT Circular No. 667 dated 18.10.1993, supporting the inclusion of the cost of land as part of the cost of the new residential house.

4. Compliance with the stipulated time frame for construction of a new residential house under Section 54:
The CIT(A) noted that no construction was made within the stipulated period of three years. The assessee contended that the delay in construction was due to the developer's failure to hand over possession of the plot, which was beyond the assessee's control. The assessee argued that the law does not compel the performance of an impossible act and that the investment in the plot should be considered sufficient for claiming exemption under Section 54.

Judgment:
The Tribunal considered the relevant provisions of Section 54 and the intention of the legislature to give relief in the matter of payment of tax on long-term capital gains. The Tribunal held that the investment in the purchase of the plot forms an integral part of the cost of the new residential house and is allowable as an exemption along with the cost of construction. The Tribunal noted that the assessee had taken all necessary steps to make the investment for the purchase of the house and had deposited Rs. 25,10,000/- in the Capital Gain Account, demonstrating the intention to construct a new residential house. The Tribunal applied the purposive interpretation of Section 54 as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Sanjeev Lal Vs. CIT and concluded that the assessee is entitled to the exemption under Section 54. The AO was directed to allow the exemption.

Conclusion:
The appeal filed by the assessee was allowed, and the order was pronounced in the Open Court on 14th May 2019.

---