Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether tax could be levied on the sale of old gunny bags, empty drums, film and rolls when no pre-existing taxing entry was identified by the assessing authority or the appellate authorities.
Analysis: The authorities proceeded on the premise that the assessee was a manufacturer or importer on a deemed basis and that the goods were sold inside the State, but none of them identified the specific taxing entry under which the goods were brought to tax. The mere characterization of the assessee as a manufacturer or importer could not by itself create taxability. Imposition of tax required identification of the point of tax under an existing charging entry, and that essential exercise was missing throughout the assessment and appellate proceedings. Since the authorities failed to examine that foundational issue, remand was declined because it would only afford the revenue a fresh opportunity to build a new case.
Conclusion: The assessee was not liable to suffer tax on the sale of old gunny bags, empty drums, film and rolls.