Court quashes revisional order on SEZ sale claim, remands for fresh consideration. The court quashed the revisional order to the extent of the claim regarding the Special Economic Zone (SEZ) sale, remanding the matter for fresh ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Court quashes revisional order on SEZ sale claim, remands for fresh consideration.
The court quashed the revisional order to the extent of the claim regarding the Special Economic Zone (SEZ) sale, remanding the matter for fresh consideration. The petition was disposed of without costs, with the directive for urgent certified copies of the order to be provided to the parties upon fulfilling formalities.
Issues: Challenge to order passed by revisional authority regarding Special Economic Zone (SEZ) sale; Failure to address third issue due to lack of document substantiation.
Analysis: The judgment pertains to a writ petition challenging an order dated June 20, 2017, passed by the revisional authority. The petitioners raised three issues before the revisional authority, one of which involved the disallowance of Special Economic Zone (SEZ) sale. However, the revisional authority did not address this issue, citing the petitioners' failure to produce supporting documents. The petitioners claimed to have provided the necessary documents to the departmental representative during the revisional proceedings. Still, a new representative stated that no such documents were received, leading to the impugned order being passed without considering the claim related to the third issue. The court acknowledged the situation and directed the petitioners to present any available evidence before the revisional authority to substantiate their claim regarding the SEZ sale. The court emphasized that the revisional authority must examine this evidence in accordance with the law and, if the claim is proven, allow it.
The court quashed the revisional order only to the extent of the claim concerning the SEZ sale and remanded the matter back to the revisional authority for a fresh consideration in accordance with the law and the court's observations. The writ petition, numbered W.P. No.4961(W) of 2018, was disposed of without any specific order as to costs. The court also directed that urgent certified website copies of the order would be made available to the parties upon compliance with the necessary formalities.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.