Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the sum of Rs. 71,279 received after the death of a partner from firms maintaining accounts on cash basis was includible in the total income of the deceased assessee's estate under section 24B of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.
Analysis: The reference turned on the scope of section 24B, which is a machinery provision intended to enable assessment of the income of a deceased person and recovery from representatives. The Court applied the settled rule that a legal fiction must be confined to the purpose for which it is created and cannot be extended to impose a liability that the deceased himself did not incur. The amount in question represented receipts from the deceased partner's share arising after death, and the firms kept their accounts on cash basis. On the authorities relied upon, such post-death receipts could not be treated as income of the deceased for the relevant period.
Conclusion: The sum of Rs. 71,279 was not liable to be included in the total income of the assessee under section 24B; the answer to the referred question was in the negative and in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: A statutory fiction enacted as a machinery provision for assessment of a deceased person's income cannot be extended to create a tax liability on post-death receipts that are not income of the deceased.