Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2019 (7) TMI 1094 - HC - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Court affirms Tribunal decision on Section 14A & 80P(2)(d) deductions The High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, affirming the Tribunal's decision. The Court held that Section 14A does not apply to income eligible for ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Court affirms Tribunal decision on Section 14A & 80P(2)(d) deductions

                          The High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, affirming the Tribunal's decision. The Court held that Section 14A does not apply to income eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d), emphasizing the distinction between deductions under Chapter VIA and exempt income under Chapter III. The Court confirmed that no error of law was committed, upholding the Tribunal's order.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Whether the ITAT erred in allowing the disallowance of Rs. 1,91,58,728 without appreciating that the assessee failed to establish that no borrowed funds were used for interest income and dividend income earned.
                          2. Whether the ITAT is justified in deleting the disallowance without appreciating that the share capital/reserve of the assessee is less than such investment, implying the use of borrowed funds for such investment/FDs.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          Issue 1: Allowance of Disallowance without Establishing Source of Funds
                          The Revenue contended that the ITAT erred in allowing the disallowance of Rs. 1,91,58,728, arguing that the assessee failed to prove that no borrowed funds were used for earning interest and dividend income. The Assessing Officer (AO) declined the deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, asserting that Section 14A, which deals with disallowance of expenditure incurred in relation to income not included in total income, was applicable. The AO reasoned that the deduction under Section 80P is made out of the gross total income, thus attracting Section 14A.

                          The CIT(A) allowed the appeal, distinguishing between exempt income under Section 10 and deductions under Chapter VIA, noting that the AO failed to understand this distinction. The CIT(A) emphasized that the interest and dividend income were already part of the gross total income and not claimed as exempt income, thus Section 14A was not applicable.

                          The Appellate Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, noting that the assessee's investments were made from surplus funds accumulated over years, not from borrowed funds. The Tribunal cited previous decisions, including CIT vs Kribhco and CIT vs Kings Export, supporting the view that no disallowance under Section 14A can be made for income eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d).

                          Issue 2: Justification of Deleting Disallowance Based on Share Capital/Reserve
                          The Revenue argued that the ITAT was unjustified in deleting the disallowance without considering that the assessee's share capital/reserve was less than the investment, suggesting the use of borrowed funds. The Tribunal found that the assessee's investments were made from surplus funds dating back to 1951, not from current year's borrowed funds. The Tribunal reiterated that the interest and dividend income did not result from investments made during the year, thus no direct or indirect expenditure was incurred for earning such income.

                          The Tribunal referenced its own previous decisions in the assessee's case for earlier assessment years, consistently holding that the investments were made from surplus funds, and no new investments were made during the year under consideration. The Tribunal also noted that the AO had erroneously applied the judgment in Punjab State Cooperative Milk Producers Federation Ltd., which was distinguishable on facts.

                          Conclusion:
                          The High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, affirming the Tribunal's decision. The Court referenced its own decisions in Commissioner of Income Tax III vs. Surat District Co. Op. Milk Producer Union Ltd. and Commissioner of Income Tax, Ahmedabad IV vs. Banaskantha Dist. Co. Op. Milk Producers' Union Ltd., which held that Section 14A does not apply to income eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d). The Court emphasized that deductions under Chapter VIA, including Section 80P, are distinct from exempt income under Chapter III, and Section 14A is not applicable to such deductions. The appeal was dismissed, upholding the Tribunal's order and confirming that no error of law was committed.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found