Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned reassessment orders could stand when the assessing authority sought TDS credit particulars only after passing the orders, and whether the matter required remand for fresh consideration after giving the assessee a personal hearing.
Analysis: The assessments arose under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 on the basis of returns filed under Section 21 and deemed assessments under Section 22(2). The core dispute concerned credit for tax deducted at source, and the record showed that the assessing authority had sought credit particulars from the TDS circle only after the impugned orders were passed. Since the assessments were made without the relevant TDS credit details, the defect went to the root of the decision and could not be cured by the fact that objections had been considered. The presence of typographical errors in the dealer identification number further reinforced the need for a fresh exercise.
Conclusion: The impugned orders were set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh assessment after obtaining TDS credit particulars and granting a personal hearing to the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The writ petitions were allowed in part, with the assessments annulled and reconsideration directed afresh in accordance with law.
Ratio Decidendi: An assessment made without first obtaining material bearing on tax credit entitlement, where that material is central to the liability determination, cannot be sustained and must be redone after affording a proper hearing.