Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the revised assessment order under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 was liable to be set aside for non-adherence to the JKM Graphics principle and the matter remitted for fresh assessment.
Analysis: The impugned revised assessment was made under Section 27 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006. The challenge was confined to the absence of compliance with the procedure laid down in JKM Graphics in cases involving mismatch-based revision. The factual dispute regarding service of the revisional notice was left open, and the decisive consideration was that the assessment could not be sustained without applying the JKM Graphics framework. The Court therefore followed the earlier order in identical facts and directed a fresh assessment after the petitioner produced supporting documents.
Conclusion: The revised assessment order was set aside and the matter was remitted to the assessing authority to redo the assessment in accordance with law by applying the JKM Graphics principle.
Ratio Decidendi: A revised assessment based on mismatch cannot be sustained unless the assessing authority follows the JKM Graphics procedure before finalising the revision.