Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2019 (7) TMI 359 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Long-term capital gains and penalty on estimated addition: possession-based transfer and no concealment proof sustained relief. Transfer of property was treated as a long-term capital asset transfer where possession and part performance had passed earlier, and later registration ...
                          Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                              Long-term capital gains and penalty on estimated addition: possession-based transfer and no concealment proof sustained relief.

                              Transfer of property was treated as a long-term capital asset transfer where possession and part performance had passed earlier, and later registration did not change the income-tax character of the transfer; the gain was therefore assessed as long-term capital gain and deduction under section 54 was allowable. Agricultural receipts were not rejected in full, but on the available land and sale evidence a reasonable estimate was made and only part of the receipts was treated as taxable non-agricultural income. Penalty under section 271(1)(c) was not sustainable because the addition was based on estimation and there was no independent proof of concealment or inaccurate particulars.




                              Issues: (i) Whether the transfer of property was a long-term capital asset transfer so as to assess the gain as long-term capital gain and allow deduction under section 54; (ii) Whether the agricultural receipts could be treated partly as taxable income on estimation; (iii) Whether penalty under section 271(1)(c) was leviable on the estimated addition.

                              Issue (i): Whether the transfer of property was a long-term capital asset transfer so as to assess the gain as long-term capital gain and allow deduction under section 54.

                              Analysis: The property was held to have been acquired with possession and payment in the earlier financial year, and the subsequent registration of the deed did not alter the fact that the transfer was complete for income-tax purposes. The expanded meaning of transfer under section 2(47)(v) and the effect of part performance under section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act supported the conclusion that the asset had been held for more than 36 months. The rectification deed changing the description of the property was accepted as a bona fide correction, and the claim under section 54 was allowed on the basis of the residential nature of the property and the eligible investment.

                              Conclusion: The gain was rightly treated as long-term capital gain and the deduction under section 54 was allowable; the Revenue's challenge failed.

                              Issue (ii): Whether the agricultural receipts could be treated partly as taxable income on estimation.

                              Analysis: The assessee produced landholding extracts, crop sale bills, and other material showing agricultural activity, but complete evidence of expenditure was not available. In these circumstances, the agricultural income was not rejected in full, and a reasonable estimate of expenditure was made to determine that part of the receipts represented income from non-agricultural sources. The estimation was based on the available evidence and a pragmatic assessment of the receipts and expenses.

                              Conclusion: The estimate sustaining only Rs. 3,00,000/- as taxable income and accepting the balance as agricultural income was upheld.

                              Issue (iii): Whether penalty under section 271(1)(c) was leviable on the estimated addition.

                              Analysis: The sustained addition arose from estimation and not from any conclusive finding of concealment or deliberate furnishing of inaccurate particulars. The record did not disclose material showing that the assessee had consciously concealed income or made a false claim in the sense required for penalty. Where the quantum addition is founded on estimation, penalty for concealment is not warranted in the absence of independent evidence of mens rea or deliberate inaccuracy.

                              Conclusion: Penalty under section 271(1)(c) was not sustainable and was deleted in favour of the assessee.

                              Final Conclusion: The quantum relief granted by the first appellate authority was sustained, the Revenue's appeal was dismissed, and the assessee's appeal against penalty succeeded.

                              Ratio Decidendi: For capital gains purposes, transfer may be complete on possession and part performance even before formal registration, and penalty under section 271(1)(c) cannot be sustained where the addition rests only on estimation without proof of concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars.


                              Full Summary is available for active users!
                              Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                              Topics

                              ActsIncome Tax
                              No Records Found