Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the expression "subsidized price" in the second proviso to Section 11(3) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 covers sales made by the dealer at a price below purchase value, thereby limiting input tax credit to the extent of output tax payable.
Analysis: Section 11(3) permits input tax credit against output tax payable, and the second proviso restricts such credit where goods purchased in the State are subsequently sold at subsidized price so that the input tax on such goods does not exceed the output tax payable. The object of the proviso is to prevent a dealer from claiming input tax credit in excess of the tax output actually returned. The narrower construction adopted by the Tribunal, confining subsidized price to a sale supported by Government subsidy, was held to be incorrect. The expression was construed to include any sale by the dealer at a price below the purchase value of the goods.
Conclusion: The assessee was not entitled to claim input tax credit beyond the output tax returned on goods sold at reduced price. The issue was answered in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee.