Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the reassessment order and consequential demand notice were liable to be set aside for want of reasonable opportunity of hearing.
Analysis: The reassessment was preceded by multiple revised proposition notices fixing different tax liabilities within a short span, and the assessee was not granted adequate time to file a detailed reply. An order passed by a quasi-judicial authority without affording a reasonable opportunity of being heard is contrary to the fundamental rule of natural justice. The issuance of successive revised notices and the hurried passing of the reassessment order reflected a perfunctory approach and did not permit the assessee to meet the proposal effectively.
Conclusion: The reassessment order and consequential demand notice were set aside in favour of the assessee, with liberty to file objections to the last proposition notice and for the proceedings to be concluded in accordance with law.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition succeeded on the ground of violation of natural justice, and the impugned tax proceedings were quashed with an opportunity reserved for fresh consideration after objections.
Ratio Decidendi: A reassessment order passed by a quasi-judicial tax authority without granting a reasonable opportunity of hearing is unsustainable and liable to be set aside as being contrary to natural justice.