Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the recipient was a government entity within the meaning of the relevant exemption notification; (ii) Whether the applicant's works contract service was taxable at the prescribed rate for the initial period and thereafter exempt under the amended exemption entry as a supply in relation to a function entrusted to a Panchayat under Article 243G of the Constitution of India.
Issue (i): Whether the recipient was a government entity within the meaning of the relevant exemption notification.
Analysis: The documents produced showed that the recipient was a State Government company with overwhelming government ownership and was engaged in a public project under the Water Resources Department. On that basis, it satisfied the definition of government entity under the notification.
Conclusion: The recipient was a government entity.
Issue (ii): Whether the applicant's works contract service was taxable at the prescribed rate for the initial period and thereafter exempt under the amended exemption entry as a supply in relation to a function entrusted to a Panchayat under Article 243G of the Constitution of India.
Analysis: The work was found to be a composite works contract predominantly consisting of earthwork, dredging and allied activities, with goods forming not more than 25% of the value. The activity improved irrigation and waterways and was treated as falling within the functional ambit of the Eleventh Schedule under Article 243G. The exemption entry introduced by the amendment was held applicable for such composite supplies made to a government entity in relation to Panchayat functions. For the earlier period, the supply remained taxable under the rate notification, and after the amendment the exemption applied.
Conclusion: The supply was taxable at 18% up to 12/10/2017, taxable at 5% from 13/10/2017 to 24/01/2018, and exempt thereafter under the amended exemption entry.
Final Conclusion: The ruling recognizes the recipient as a government entity and extends exemption to the applicant's composite works contract service once the amended exemption entry became operative, while preserving taxability for the earlier periods.
Ratio Decidendi: A composite works contract supply made to a government entity is exempt when it is in relation to a function entrusted to a Panchayat under Article 243G and the value of goods does not exceed the prescribed threshold.