TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court Upholds 50% Deposit Rule for Tax Stay Orders</h1> <h3>Raj Shipping Versus The State of Maharashtra & Others</h3> Raj Shipping Versus The State of Maharashtra & Others - TMI Issues:1. Challenge to the order of the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal regarding stay of recovery proceedings.2. Interpretation of tax liability on sale of bunker fuel supplied to vessels beyond territorial limits of India.3. Consideration of lower tax rate under Schedule 'C' to the Act for bunker oil supplied to foreign going vessels.Issue 1: Challenge to Tribunal's Order on Stay of Recovery ProceedingsThe petitioner challenged the Tribunal's order directing a 50% deposit of the total tax due as a condition for stay of the recovery proceedings. The petitioner contended that the issue was a pure question of law and requested a stay on depositing only 10% of the tax payable. The Tribunal had considered the petitioner's submissions and took a prima facie view, ultimately directing a 50% deposit of the tax amount due for the stay.Issue 2: Tax Liability on Sale of Bunker FuelThe petitioner argued that no tax was payable on the sale of bunker fuel supplied to ships beyond the territorial waters of India. However, the Tribunal referred to a previous decision of the High Court which concluded against the petitioner's position. The Tribunal also noted that the petitioner admitted that the vessels to whom the bunker fuel was sold were not foreign going vessels. Consequently, the Tribunal found no fault with its prima facie view and upheld the requirement of a 50% deposit for the stay.Issue 3: Lower Tax Rate for Bunker Oil Supplied to Foreign Going VesselsThe petitioner claimed entitlement to a lower tax rate on bunker fuel supplied to foreign going vessels under Schedule 'C' to the Act. The petitioner relied on a Supreme Court decision regarding the definition of foreign going vessels. However, the Tribunal found that the petitioner's vessels did not qualify as foreign going vessels based on the petitioner's admission. The Tribunal held that the issue required detailed consideration at the final hearing of the appeal and upheld the 50% deposit requirement for the stay.The High Court dismissed the petition, affirming the Tribunal's order and emphasizing that the issue of tax liability and entitlement to lower tax rates required further examination at the final hearing of the appeal. The Court found the Tribunal's decision to direct a 50% deposit for the stay to be reasonable in light of the total amount due, including interest and penalty.
TaxTMI 