Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether cosmetics imported into India fall within the exemption for "substances not intended for medicinal use" in Schedule D of the Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945 so as to avoid the restriction under Rule 133 read with Rule 43-A of the Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945.
Analysis: "Cosmetic" and "drug" are separately defined under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940. A cosmetic, being an article intended for application to the human body for cleansing, beautifying, promoting attractiveness, or altering appearance, cannot be treated as a "substance" within the meaning of the drug definition so as to claim the general exemption in Schedule D. Rule 133 makes the import restriction applicable to cosmetics, and Rule 132 does not exempt cosmetics generally; the exemption in Schedule D is confined to cosmetics covered by the specified category, including those imported for manufacture and export by SEZ units. The imported goods, being cosmetics and not falling within that special exemption, were subject to the notified points of entry under Rule 43-A.
Conclusion: The restriction under Rule 133 read with Rule 43-A applied to the imported cosmetics, and the goods were liable to confiscation for having been imported contrary to law.