TaxTMI Login
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Just a moment...
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕ Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the order permitting recall of witnesses and production of additional documents under Section 311 of the Criminal Procedure Code, after completion of cross-examination and closure of evidence, called for interference.
Analysis: The complainant sought recall of witnesses to place on record documents said to be material to the transaction, including meeting minutes, bank statements, and delivery-related documents. The earlier rejection of a similar request had been followed by liberty to move a fresh application with specific pleadings, and the fresh applications were considered in that backdrop. Section 311 of the Criminal Procedure Code enables the Court to summon, examine, or recall any witness at any stage if the evidence appears necessary for a just decision. The Court applied the principle that the best available evidence should be brought before the Court and that the power under Section 311 is intended to aid the discovery of truth. It held that the accused would have full opportunity to cross-examine the recalled witnesses and that no prejudice would be caused by allowing the documents to be produced.
Conclusion: The order allowing recall of witnesses and production of documents was upheld, and interference was refused.
Ratio Decidendi: The power under Section 311 of the Criminal Procedure Code should be exercised to enable the Court to discover the truth and reach a just decision, provided the opposite party is not prejudiced and retains the opportunity to cross-examine.
TaxTMI 
