Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2019 (6) TMI 1115 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal dismisses revenue's appeal, finding AO's conclusions unreliable, lacking evidence. Books rejection unjustified. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to delete the addition on account of suppression of yield, finding that the AO's conclusions were based on ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal dismisses revenue's appeal, finding AO's conclusions unreliable, lacking evidence. Books rejection unjustified.

                          The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to delete the addition on account of suppression of yield, finding that the AO's conclusions were based on unreliable statements and lacked corroborative evidence. The rejection of the books of accounts was also deemed unjustified. Consequently, the revenue's appeals were dismissed, and the assessee's cross-objections were rendered infructuous.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Validity of reassessment proceedings under Section 147.
                          2. Deletion of addition on account of suppression of yield.
                          3. Reliability of statements recorded during survey under Section 133A.
                          4. Rejection of books of accounts.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Validity of Reassessment Proceedings under Section 147:
                          The assessee contested the validity of reassessment proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer (AO) under Section 147, which were based on the findings for AY 2011-12. The Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] upheld the reassessment, stating that the AO had specific information of suspected purchases and tangible material at the time of issuing notice under Section 148. Since the revenue’s appeal on merits was dismissed, the issue of reassessment became academic and was not further deliberated. Consequently, the assessee’s appeals on this ground were dismissed as infructuous.

                          2. Deletion of Addition on Account of Suppression of Yield:
                          The AO added Rs. 1097.13 Lacs to the income of the assessee for AY 2011-12, alleging suppression of yield. The CIT(A) deleted this addition, noting several key points:
                          - The AO’s addition was based on statements recorded during a survey under Section 133A, which lacked corroborative evidence.
                          - The AO failed to point out specific defects in the books of accounts, which were duly audited.
                          - The AO’s estimation of yield at 87% was arbitrary and not supported by any expert opinion or technical evidence.
                          - The assessee provided technical reports from government bodies (CPPRI & SRI) supporting the yield reflected in the books, which the AO did not counter with any technical evidence.
                          - The CIT(A) observed that no incriminating material regarding unaccounted cash, purchases, sales, or investments was found during the survey.

                          3. Reliability of Statements Recorded During Survey under Section 133A:
                          The AO relied heavily on statements made by the assessee’s employees and Managing Director (MD) during the survey. However, the CIT(A) and the Tribunal found these statements to be unreliable as they were not supported by any documentary evidence. The MD’s statement indicating a yield of 83.44% was corroborated by the actual yield on the date of the survey. The Tribunal emphasized that statements recorded under Section 133A do not have evidentiary value unless corroborated with circumstantial evidence or cogent material. This principle was supported by judicial precedents, including the decision of the Hon’ble Madras High Court in CIT vs. S. Khader Khan and the Hon’ble Supreme Court.

                          4. Rejection of Books of Accounts:
                          The AO rejected the assessee’s books of accounts, alleging that the yield was understated by inflating purchases. The CIT(A) and the Tribunal found this rejection unjustified because:
                          - No specific discrepancies or defects were pointed out in the books, which were audited.
                          - The AO’s estimation of yield was arbitrary and not based on any sound basis or technical evidence.
                          - The suppliers confirmed the genuineness of sales to the assessee and were regularly filing their tax returns.
                          - No discrepancies were found in the physical stock of raw material or finished goods during the survey.

                          Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)’s decision to delete the addition on account of suppression of yield, finding that the AO’s conclusions were based on unreliable statements and lacked corroborative evidence. The rejection of the books of accounts was also deemed unjustified. Consequently, the revenue’s appeals were dismissed, and the assessee’s cross-objections were rendered infructuous.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found