Marginal delay in tax appeal condoned where sufficient cause supported adjudication on merits instead of technical dismissal.

An appeal under the Karnataka Value Added Tax framework must ordinarily be filed within thirty days, but a delayed appeal may still be admitted within the statutory extended period if sufficient cause is shown. Where the delay is only marginal and no deliberate delay or mala fides is established, the preference is for adjudication on merits rather than rejection on a technical limitation ground. The 2-day delay was therefore condoned, the dismissal as time-barred was quashed, and the matter was remanded to the Appellate Authority for decision on merits without reference to limitation.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appeal before the Appellate Authority was liable to be rejected as time-barred and whether a short delay in filing the appeal could be condoned under Section 62 of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003.

Analysis: Section 62(2) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 permits an appeal against an assessment order within thirty days from service of notice, while Section 62(3) empowers the Appellate Authority to admit a delayed appeal within a further period of one hundred and eighty days on being satisfied that sufficient cause existed. The appeal was stated to have been delayed only marginally, and the dispute involved a substantial tax demand. In such circumstances, the preference is for adjudication on merits rather than denial of relief on a technical lapse, particularly where no deliberate delay or mala fides is shown.

Conclusion: The delay of 2 days was condoned, the order dismissing the appeal as barred by limitation was quashed, and the matter was remanded to the Appellate Authority for decision on merits without reference to limitation.

---