Court Rules Dream 11 Fantasy Games Are Skill-based, Escrow Amounts Not Taxable under GST

The court held that the activities of the respondent, Dream 11 Fantasy Pvt. Ltd., do not amount to gambling or betting but are games of skill. The court dismissed the allegations of Goods and Services Tax (GST) evasion based on erroneous classification, finding that the amounts pooled in the escrow account are not taxable under GST as they are actionable claims exempt from taxation. The court upheld the classification of Dream 11's platform fees under entry 998439, justifying the 18% GST rate applied by Dream 11. The criminal PIL was dismissed with no order as to costs.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Whether the activities of the respondent No. 3 amount to 'Gambling' or 'Betting'.
2. Whether there is any merit in the allegation of violation of Rule 31A(3) of CGST Rules, 2018 and erroneous classification.

Detailed Analysis:

Issue 1: Whether the activities of the respondent No. 3 amount to 'Gambling' or 'Betting'

The petitioner, a public-spirited advocate, sought criminal prosecution against respondent No. 3, Dream 11 Fantasy Pvt. Ltd., alleging that their online fantasy sports gaming operations constitute illegal gambling/betting under the Public Gambling Act, 1867. The petitioner argued that these fantasy games lure people to spend money for quick earnings, which often results in losses, thus amounting to gambling. However, the respondent No. 3 countered that this issue had already been adjudicated by the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which held that Dream 11’s fantasy sports are games of skill, not chance, and thus exempt from the penal provisions of the Public Gambling Act, 1867. This judgment was upheld by the Supreme Court. The Bombay High Court agreed with the previous rulings, stating that the activities of Dream 11 do not amount to gambling or betting, as success in these games arises from the user's exercise of superior knowledge, judgment, and attention, making them games of skill.

Issue 2: Whether there is any merit in the allegation of violation of Rule 31A(3) of CGST Rules, 2018 and erroneous classification

The petitioner alleged that Dream 11 evaded Goods and Services Tax (GST) by not paying tax on the entire amount staked by players, which should be classified under Rule 31A(3) of CGST Rules, 2018, similar to horse racing. The respondent No. 3 argued that their activities are predominantly games of skill and thus fall outside the purview of Rule 31A(3), which applies to gambling and betting. The court noted that the amounts pooled in the escrow account are actionable claims, which, under Schedule III of the CGST Act, are neither supply of goods nor services and thus exempt from GST. The court found no merit in the petitioner’s claim that the entire deposit received from players is taxable, as the actionable claims related to Dream 11’s fantasy sports do not amount to betting or gambling. The court also upheld the classification of Dream 11’s platform fees under entry 998439, which covers online games intended to be played on the internet, and excludes online gambling services, thus justifying the 18% GST rate applied by Dream 11.

Conclusion:

The court concluded that the activities of Dream 11 do not amount to gambling or betting and are predominantly games of skill. Consequently, the allegations of GST evasion based on erroneous classification were also dismissed. The petition was found to be wholly untenable and misconceived, and thus, the criminal PIL was dismissed with no order as to costs.

---